<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pandas and Beavers and White Guys, oh my!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2008/06/25/pandas-and-beavers-and-white-guys-oh-my/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2008/06/25/pandas-and-beavers-and-white-guys-oh-my/</link>
	<description>Looking for reason in all the wrong places.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlsimons</title>
		<link>http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2008/06/25/pandas-and-beavers-and-white-guys-oh-my/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlsimons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlsimons.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment, Bentley. I understand what you&#039;re saying, and in fact, that&#039;s probably not far off from the explanation the creative team used in describing the ad to their clients. On its technical merits, it&#039;s a good ad. But on the level of racism and sexism, I think it needs to be judged through a different lens. Frequently, isms are in the eye of the beholder. I don&#039;t always agree when somebody feels something is offensive, but I&#039;m usually not the one being offended. I am not a champion of political correctness, in fact, quite the opposite. I believe in freedom of speech and the sometimes problematic and offensive consequences of it. And that&#039;s my point here. People get all hot and bothered about one form of offensiveness and are not bothered about another, because the first offends them, and the second doesn&#039;t. Whether it&#039;s last year&#039;s Snickers ad or this year&#039;s, somebody&#039;s getting offended. All I&#039;m saying is let&#039;s be a little more even handed. Ban them all, or don&#039;t ban any of them. I&#039;ll handle explaining it to my daughter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Bentley. I understand what you&#8217;re saying, and in fact, that&#8217;s probably not far off from the explanation the creative team used in describing the ad to their clients. On its technical merits, it&#8217;s a good ad. But on the level of racism and sexism, I think it needs to be judged through a different lens. Frequently, isms are in the eye of the beholder. I don&#8217;t always agree when somebody feels something is offensive, but I&#8217;m usually not the one being offended. I am not a champion of political correctness, in fact, quite the opposite. I believe in freedom of speech and the sometimes problematic and offensive consequences of it. And that&#8217;s my point here. People get all hot and bothered about one form of offensiveness and are not bothered about another, because the first offends them, and the second doesn&#8217;t. Whether it&#8217;s last year&#8217;s Snickers ad or this year&#8217;s, somebody&#8217;s getting offended. All I&#8217;m saying is let&#8217;s be a little more even handed. Ban them all, or don&#8217;t ban any of them. I&#8217;ll handle explaining it to my daughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BentleyG</title>
		<link>http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2008/06/25/pandas-and-beavers-and-white-guys-oh-my/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BentleyG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlsimons.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a as an overweight, scruffy-faced, frequently long-haired and usually sloppily dressed guy also - , I did not get offended by this ad.   It&#039;s not about the white, black, scruffy, overweight what ever... 

It&#039;s about the guy who most importantly doesn&#039;t know enough about the game of tennis to know that you use a racket, not briefcase but can still get let on the playing field.

It&#039;s about the professional tennis player having to stand out in a field where guys who are just there to steal the balls are let in.

Your first take on the commercial was correct - and to prove it - in your mind - make the tennis player (mind you a professional tennis player talented enough and in shape enough to demand a court with a sold out crowd watching) a women - a black person - what ever.  The message still stands true...   A sold out crowd would not come to see a guy play tennis with a briefcase.

I think your friend Laura is friends with Mulder and Oliver Stone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a as an overweight, scruffy-faced, frequently long-haired and usually sloppily dressed guy also &#8211; , I did not get offended by this ad.   It&#8217;s not about the white, black, scruffy, overweight what ever&#8230; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s about the guy who most importantly doesn&#8217;t know enough about the game of tennis to know that you use a racket, not briefcase but can still get let on the playing field.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about the professional tennis player having to stand out in a field where guys who are just there to steal the balls are let in.</p>
<p>Your first take on the commercial was correct &#8211; and to prove it &#8211; in your mind &#8211; make the tennis player (mind you a professional tennis player talented enough and in shape enough to demand a court with a sold out crowd watching) a women &#8211; a black person &#8211; what ever.  The message still stands true&#8230;   A sold out crowd would not come to see a guy play tennis with a briefcase.</p>
<p>I think your friend Laura is friends with Mulder and Oliver Stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

