Comments on: How to Make Scrapple Less Appetizing http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2009/10/08/how-to-make-scrapple-less-appetizing/ Looking for reason in all the wrong places. Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:41:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Dylan Lindeen http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2009/10/08/how-to-make-scrapple-less-appetizing/#comment-682 Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:36:56 +0000 http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/?p=505#comment-682 We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community. Your content provided us valuable information to work on.You have done a marvellous job!

]]> By: jlsimons http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2009/10/08/how-to-make-scrapple-less-appetizing/#comment-488 Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:02:12 +0000 http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/?p=505#comment-488 I agree that spell check leads to contextual errors all the time (there instead of their, for example) but I think they had to go out of their way to miss this one. Although sometimes people don’t check capitalized words, so on second thought you’re probably right. But spell check won’t catch numerical errors at all, so don’t you think their live eyeballs should have picked this one up? Speaking of eyeballs, I wonder if they put them in Scrapple? Thanks again for the comment, FR.

]]> By: Faithful Reader http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/2009/10/08/how-to-make-scrapple-less-appetizing/#comment-487 Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:14:31 +0000 http://cansomeonepleaseexplain.com/?p=505#comment-487 Your point is well taken. I would observe in addition that in this day of computer “spell check” options, this type of error is all too common. After all, Rapa isn’t a word (except in Rapa Nui) and rape is, so perhaps many are relying too heavily on spell check and not enough on good old fashioned proof reading? Just a thought…

F.R.

]]>